Red Right Daily

Truth in Freedom

Bass Responds To Trump Administration Immigration Operations

Bass Responds To Trump Administration Immigration Operations

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass continues to draw scrutiny—not just for her administration’s performance, but for her increasingly erratic statements regarding federal immigration enforcement and basic constitutional authority.

On July 13, Bass accused the federal government of “seizing power and authority from state and local governments,” labeling it “un-American.” She also advanced a claim that Los Angeles is being used as an “experiment” by federal authorities. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) responded by reiterating its legal authority to enforce federal immigration law across all U.S. jurisdictions, including Los Angeles.


The controversy escalated during a July 21 appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation. When asked by host Margaret Brennan why she objected to ICE agents wearing masks—given the threats they face—Bass’s response raised further concerns.

“Well – well, first of all, let me just tell you that the masked men are not from Los Angeles,” Bass said. “So how their families could be retaliated against?” She then compared ICE agents to LAPD officers, who she noted typically identify themselves and don’t wear masks. Bass concluded, “I have a hard time believing that the woman selling pineapples on the corner will going to attack an ICE agent.”


Her remarks overlook the broader reality: threats against federal agents are not confined by city boundaries, and attacks have occurred during enforcement operations, often fueled by hostile rhetoric and misinformation.

Bass’s comments triggered backlash not only for dismissing legitimate safety concerns but also for minimizing the dangers ICE agents face. Calls for agents to remove their masks under volatile conditions place federal employees at unnecessary risk.

In a follow-up post on social media, Bass further escalated her rhetoric: “They’re going after people selling fruit and working at car washes. It’s unconstitutional and it must end.” During the interview, Brennan reminded her that ICE procedures do not rely on a single factor, but on multiple indicators—including occupation, location, and physical behavior. Former ICE Director Tom Homan has previously stated that context and behavior are considered together in enforcement actions.


Bass’s retort—asserting that sitting at a bus stop or selling fruit should disqualify someone from suspicion—misrepresents Homan’s position and ICE protocol. Her statement also inadvertently undermines her argument by acknowledging that certain industries, like car washes, are now experiencing labor shortages. She attributed this to fears of immigration raids, yet simultaneously denied that location or occupation could be relevant factors for enforcement.

Bass’s framing—portraying illegal immigrants as essential laborers while demanding that federal agencies cease lawful enforcement—highlights a recurring contradiction. The rule of law, including immigration law, applies universally. Entry without authorization is a federal violation, regardless of one’s occupation.


The legal authority for federal enforcement did not originate with the Trump administration. It is longstanding statutory law, and ICE’s operations fall within that mandate. Bass’s rhetoric not only mischaracterizes the law but risks undermining lawful authority through misinformation and public confusion.

Written by Mark Stevens - July 22, 2025