Red Right Daily

Truth in Freedom

Gov. Ron DeSantis Adds Perspective To Mamdani’s Budget Proposal

Gov. Ron DeSantis Adds Perspective To Mamdani’s Budget Proposal

“There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.”

Milton Friedman’s famous line distilled a basic economic truth: resources are limited, and when government promises something “free,” someone else ultimately pays. The math may be delayed, disguised, or redistributed — but it never disappears.

New York City is now staring at that math.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani released his preliminary budget this week, warning of a $5.4 billion shortfall and outlining what he described as two paths forward. The first: persuade Albany to raise taxes on high earners and profitable corporations. The second — labeled a “last resort” — would rely on tools available at the city level, including raising property taxes and tapping reserves.

“After years of fiscal mismanagement, we’re staring at a $5.4 billion budget gap — and two paths,” Mamdani wrote on X. He framed higher state-level taxes on the wealthy as a “sustainable and fair solution,” while cautioning that absent action from Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Legislature, the city may have to take more painful steps.

The New York Times reported that Mamdani is preparing a 9.5 percent increase in property tax rates if Albany does not act. The hike would apply to more than 3 million single-family homes, co-ops, and condos, along with over 100,000 commercial buildings. Mamdani acknowledged the increase would not fall solely on high earners, describing it as a “tax on working- and middle-class New Yorkers,” though he emphasized it is not his preferred route.


The political framing is clear: Albany has the power to shift the burden upward; City Hall has more limited levers. But critics argue that expanding government commitments while relying on uncertain revenue streams inevitably produces this kind of squeeze. When projected revenues fail to match spending, the gap must be closed somewhere.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis offered a blunt comparison. He noted that Florida’s $117 billion state budget serves more than 23 million residents — roughly $5,087 per person. By contrast, New York City’s $127 billion budget spread across 8 million residents equals about $15,875 per person. The figures reflect different scopes of responsibility and cost structures, but they underscore the scale of spending at issue.

New York’s fiscal challenges are not new. Decades of obligations — from pension commitments to infrastructure costs — have shaped the city’s budget trajectory. What is new is the governing philosophy now steering City Hall. Mamdani has long advocated progressive taxation and wealth redistribution as solutions to structural inequality.


Supporters argue that higher taxes on top earners are necessary to fund public services and reduce disparities. Opponents counter that escalating tax burdens risk driving capital, businesses, and residents elsewhere — shrinking the very base needed to sustain the budget.

The immediate question is whether Albany will accommodate the mayor’s call for higher state-level taxes. The longer-term question is more fundamental: can a city already facing a multibillion-dollar deficit grow its way out through taxation alone, or does the equation eventually require spending restraint?

Friedman’s maxim lingers in the background. The bill always comes due. The only debate is who pays it — and when.

Written by Mark Stevens - February 19, 2026