Red Right Daily

Truth in Freedom

NPS Staffers Speak Out After Layoffs

NPS Staffers Speak Out After Layoffs

The recent shake-ups within the National Park Service have drawn attention, not just for the job cuts themselves but for the reaction of some former employees. Among the most bizarre details to emerge is the firing of Yosemite National Park’s sole locksmith—a decision that, at first glance, might seem like bureaucratic overreach.

However, a closer look reveals a different story: Why was there only one locksmith responsible for the entire park? And why did it require specialized “institutional knowledge” to unlock a restroom door? If anything, this anecdote underscores the very inefficiencies that make government agencies ripe for reform.

Beyond the locksmith situation, Yosemite also became a stage for political protests following these staffing changes. A group of six individuals took it upon themselves to hang an upside-down American flag from El Capitan—an act they described as a symbolic gesture of distress, meant to highlight what they view as an assault on public lands. Their statement decried the Department of the Interior’s policy shifts, particularly those favoring drilling and mining interests, and expressed outrage over widespread staffing reductions.

While their frustration is understandable, the method of protest raises questions. If the goal of national park employees is to protect these lands, does using them as a platform for political activism align with that mission? Furthermore, when images surfaced of protest signs bearing slogans like “Silence is violence” and “ACAB” (All Cops Are Bastards), it became clear that the message had veered beyond concerns for environmental stewardship and into broader ideological territory.

Public reaction on social media was swift and unsympathetic. Many questioned whether these protests were conducted on taxpayer time and money—if so, the participants had inadvertently made the case that their positions were indeed non-essential. Others pointed out the hypocrisy in how flag symbolism is treated differently depending on the cause.

When an inverted American flag was spotted outside Justice Samuel Alito’s home, left-leaning commentators were quick to condemn it as an inflammatory political statement. But when the same symbol was used to protest federal budget cuts, the reaction was quite different.

At the heart of this issue is a simple reality: The federal government, now over $35 trillion in debt, can no longer afford to operate as if jobs are guaranteed regardless of necessity or performance. Unlike the private sector, where efficiency and cost-cutting are constant concerns, government agencies have long functioned with the assumption of job security. The resistance to these cuts reflects a broader mindset—one in which unelected bureaucrats believe they should have the power to dictate policy rather than implement the directives of a duly elected administration.

Written by Mark Stevens - February 24, 2025