Oversight Committee Releases Report On Biden
The House Oversight Committee has released a scathing and politically seismic report detailing what it alleges to be a systemic and deliberate cover-up of President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline — a report that now formally calls for a full-scale Department of Justice investigation into the legitimacy of his executive actions, the integrity of his inner circle, and the ethical conduct of the White House physician.
At the center of the report is a grim portrait of a presidency heavily managed behind the scenes. According to the Committee, Biden’s day-to-day operations were not merely curated — they were orchestrated. From how many steps he could handle to how long he could read, from the decision to use teleprompters even in private meetings to relying on Hollywood “direction” for public addresses, the report outlines what it calls “a presidency built on performance rather than capacity.”
But it goes further. Much further.
Among the most damning revelations is the invocation of the Fifth Amendment by Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, who refused to answer whether he had ever been told to lie about the president’s condition or believed Biden was unfit for office. The Committee argues that this silence, paired with testimony pointing to political influence over medical decisions, should prompt an immediate investigation by the D.C. Board of Medicine into potential ethical breaches.
And then comes the autopen scandal — a controversy Republicans are now branding “one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history.” According to the Oversight Committee, numerous executive actions, including high-profile pardons, were signed by an autopen device with no documented proof of Biden’s direct involvement or consent. If true, this could call into question the legal validity of those actions, as the Constitution does not permit the delegation of presidential clemency powers — especially not in cases where mental competence is under scrutiny.
In perhaps the most eye-popping claim, the report alleges that Hunter Biden played a role in internal discussions about pardons toward the end of the administration. Former White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients confirmed that Hunter was involved in those “family discussions” — a revelation that is likely to ignite a new round of public and congressional outrage.
The report also listed specific names whose clemency was discussed: five Biden family members, Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and even members of the January 6th Select Committee. Such disclosures raise questions not just about presidential fitness, but about abuse of power and political insulation.
Significantly, the Committee’s findings conclude that executive decisions without “sufficient contemporaneous documentation” proving Biden’s awareness and involvement should be considered void. It’s a bold legal argument, one that could — if validated — unravel a trail of policy decisions stretching across the entire administration.
In one revealing quote, senior adviser Anita Dunn said that after Biden’s infamous debate collapse, there was internal debate about a cognitive test — not because they feared he’d fail, but because “it wouldn’t help politically.” That remark alone underscores the Committee’s broader accusation: that this administration prioritized optics over transparency, and loyalty over truth.
The Oversight Committee’s letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi isn’t a symbolic gesture. It’s a trigger point — a direct demand for accountability that places DOJ officials, White House staff, and even family members squarely in the spotlight.
If the report’s recommendations are followed, the DOJ will now be tasked with dissecting four years of executive actions to determine which — if any — were legally authorized by a competent Commander-in-Chief. And if not, the constitutional ramifications could be staggering.