AP Looks Into Records Following Trump Rally
Let’s dive into the latest chapter in the ongoing saga of American politics and media. The Associated Press (AP) has been stirring the pot with its coverage following the attack on GOP nominee and former President Donald Trump. Less than a week after the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania, media outlets are already buzzing with speculation and controversy.
The AP has criticized Trump for not making his medical records public immediately following the incident. Despite the ongoing GOP convention and the fact that it’s been only a few days since the attack, the press is pressing for details. This rush to judgment has led to some eyebrow-raising moments in the media.
Trump has given no official info about his medical care for days since an assassination attempt https://t.co/P4qyPiEA91
— The Associated Press (@AP) July 18, 2024
Interestingly, some journalists are entertaining theories that seem to contradict their own standards of reporting. For instance, there are suggestions that Trump wasn’t directly hit by a bullet but was injured by shattering glass from teleprompters. This line of thought raises a crucial point: if the teleprompters were hit by a sniper’s bullet, then the threat to Trump’s life was still very real.
Furthermore, the footage from the incident clearly shows the teleprompters intact, challenging the narrative that Trump’s injuries came from shattered glass. One might expect thorough investigation from journalists before jumping to conclusions, but that hasn’t been the case here. Even established figures like MSNBC’s Michael Steele, who previously dismissed concerns about Joe Biden’s health, are now questioning the reality of Trump’s injuries despite clear visual evidence.
“Journalism” Professor https://t.co/vg52gBp33m pic.twitter.com/e9OEh99Zcf
— Brad Slager – Scrubbing Down In a Bloodbath (@MartiniShark) July 17, 2024
The call for more hospital details on Trump’s injuries has fueled further speculation. The AP report emphasizes the need for transparency about the extent of Trump’s injuries, the treatment he received, and potential long-term effects. However, the injury – a perforated upper ear – is visibly minor and unlikely to cause significant long-term issues. Trump’s quick return to public appearances supports this assessment.
Contrast this with the press’s approach to President Biden’s health. Over the past months, there has been considerable speculation about Biden’s physical and mental state, especially following his lackluster debate performance. Despite occasional challenges from White House correspondents, the media has shown limited interest in demanding detailed medical records from Biden. This disparity highlights an imbalance in media scrutiny between the two political figures.
Recall the uproar when the Robert Hur report suggested Biden was in a diminished state. Conservative outlets have called for the release of interview tapes, but mainstream media has shown little interest. This selective scrutiny becomes glaring when juxtaposed with the intense focus on Trump’s relatively minor injury.