Red Right Daily

Truth in Freedom

Boykin Comments On Trump Admin Policy

Boykin Comments On Trump Admin Policy

A brief exchange on CNN managed to puncture one of the more common talking points surrounding Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and it did so in a way that left little room for retreat. Batya Unger-Sargon, a CNN guest and NewsNation host who occupies an unusual space as a left-leaning populist aligned with the MAGA movement, confronted the claim that ICE has only recently become politicized under President Donald Trump. The moment came during a panel discussion with Keith Boykin, a frequent progressive commentator, as the conversation turned to immigration enforcement and unrest tied to Minneapolis.


Boykin advanced a familiar argument: that ICE is now operating as a politicized arm of the Trump administration, transformed into something akin to a presidential police force. In his telling, this politicization represented a sharp break from the agency’s past, suggesting that its current posture is unprecedented and driven by Trump himself. The framing implied that federal immigration enforcement had once existed in a neutral space, only recently corrupted by politics.


Unger-Sargon cut through that narrative with a blunt rejoinder. She argued that ICE did not become politicized by enforcement actions or presidential rhetoric, but by years of relentless demonization from Democratic politicians and activists. By invoking comparisons to the Gestapo and labeling agents as Nazis, she contended, the left itself dragged the agency into overtly political territory. Her response flipped the accusation on its head: if ICE is now seen through a political lens, it is because one side spent years insisting on that framing.


The exchange was striking not only for its clarity but for the messenger delivering it. Unger-Sargon is not a conventional conservative, which blunts the reflexive dismissal often directed at right-leaning commentators. Her critique carried additional weight precisely because it came from someone who identifies with populist economic concerns and has roots on the political left, even while supporting Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda. That positioning allows her to challenge progressive orthodoxies without relying on traditional partisan cues.


This was not the first time Unger-Sargon has sparred effectively with left-wing panelists, and it fits a broader pattern seen with figures like Scott Jennings, Kevin O’Leary, and Ben Ferguson, all of whom have developed a reputation for dismantling loosely constructed talking points in real time. What distinguishes Unger-Sargon is her ability to do so while rejecting the label of conservative altogether, forcing critics to engage the substance of her argument rather than the stereotype of her politics.

Written by Mark Stevens - February 5, 2026