Vance Answers Questions About Redistricting and Immigration During Welker Interview
During this weekend’s Meet the Press interview, Vice President JD Vance made headlines with a forceful, clear-eyed dismantling of the left’s narrative on redistricting—and, in doing so, reframed the national conversation around fairness, representation, and the deep hypocrisy embedded in partisan map-drawing.
“All we’re doing, frankly, is trying to make the situation a little bit more fair,” says @VP on redistricting.
“Democrats have gerrymandered their states really aggressively. We think there are opportunities to push back against that, and that’s really all we’re doing.” pic.twitter.com/q06A8CkniT
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 24, 2025
Vance took aim at the Democrats’ long-standing dominance in redistricting, pointing out that while they love to portray themselves as victims of gerrymandering, they’ve spent decades mastering the art in their own strongholds. Massachusetts served as a prime example. Despite 32% of its population voting Republican, the state sends zero Republican representatives to Congress. Vance wasn’t making a partisan dig—he was exposing a deeper structural imbalance that belies the rhetoric of those crying foul.
But it didn’t stop there.
Vance brought to light a rarely discussed issue: the role of non-citizens in congressional apportionment. As he explained, illegal aliens are currently counted in the census, which determines how many seats each state receives in the House of Representatives. This, he argued, dramatically shifts the balance of power—not based on the number of voting citizens, but based on raw population, regardless of legal status.
“We’re literally losing representatives for American citizens in order to give congressional representation to illegal aliens,” says @VP.
“Republicans are trying to balance out the scales a little bit for basic fairness and for the integrity of our democracy.” pic.twitter.com/uxxDXQJege
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 24, 2025
Take California. According to estimates Vance referenced, the state may have as many as five congressional seats it wouldn’t have if apportionment were based solely on the population of American citizens. That’s not a fringe argument. It strikes at the core of the principle of equal representation—and raises uncomfortable questions about how legislative power is distributed.
Welker attempted to redirect, stating that “undocumented people can’t vote.” But Vance stayed on course. That’s not the issue, he pointed out. It’s not about votes—it’s about how many seats a state gets because of its population, regardless of who can legally vote. This isn’t a partisan sleight of hand. It’s a question of constitutional integrity.
.@VP on illegal aliens in the Census: “They do go in the congressional apportionment. That’s why California has so many more seats is because they count illegal aliens… They end up getting congressional representation that ought, by right, go to American citizens.” pic.twitter.com/Lfu3kYaM6N
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 24, 2025
And if President Trump succeeds in recalibrating the census to reflect citizen populations—something Vance hinted might be on the horizon—it could represent one of the most profound shifts in congressional balance in decades.
